Rhetoric & Public Affairs https://ojs.msupress.org/index.php/RPA <span><em>Rhetoric &amp; Public Affairs</em> is an interdisciplinary journal devoted to the history, theory, and criticism of public discourse. Arenas of rhetorical investigation might include but are by no means limited to campaigns for social, political, environmental or economic justice; modes of resistance to those campaigns; situated instances of executive leadership; legislative and judicial deliberations; comparative rhetorics; transnational diplomacy; digital circulation and mediation of public discourse; and/or constitution of political and social identities. Critical, analytical, or interpretive essays examining symbolic influences in any historical period (including the contemporary) anywhere in the world are welcome. Of special interest are manuscripts that interrogate dynamics of power and privilege, voice and voicelessness, oppression and resistance as well as axes of identity such as race, gender, sexuality, ability, citizenship, and class, as these take form in concrete rhetorical situations. Moreover, we welcome essays that explore the nexus of rhetoric, politics, and ethics–the worlds of power, persuasion, and social values as they meet in the crucible of public deliberation, debate, and protest.</span> en-US <p><span>Articles accepted for publication cannot go to print without a signed agreement:</span></p><p><a href="https://dhjhkxawhe8q4.cloudfront.net/michigan-state-university-press/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/09183045/RPA-Author-Publishing-Agreement.pdf">Article Publishing Agreement</a></p><p><a href="https://dhjhkxawhe8q4.cloudfront.net/michigan-state-university-press/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/09183854/RPA-Book-Review-Publishing-Agreement.pdf">Book Review Publishing Agreement</a></p> journals@msu.edu (R&PA Editorial Office) journals@msupress.org (MSU Press Journals) Thu, 13 Jul 2023 12:20:29 -0400 OJS 3.3.0.5 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Satire as the Comic Public Sphere: Postmodern “Truthiness” and Civic Engagement. By James E. Caron. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 2021; pp. 1-273, $109.95 hardcover. https://ojs.msupress.org/index.php/RPA/article/view/7285 Amy M. Young Copyright (c) 2023 Amy M. Young https://ojs.msupress.org/index.php/RPA/article/view/7285 Thu, 13 Jul 2023 00:00:00 -0400 Market Affect and the Rhetoric of Political Economic Debates https://ojs.msupress.org/index.php/RPA/article/view/7557 Divine Aboagye Copyright (c) 2023 Divine Aboagye https://ojs.msupress.org/index.php/RPA/article/view/7557 Thu, 13 Jul 2023 00:00:00 -0400 Review: Informing A Nation: The Newspaper Presidency of Thomas Jefferson https://ojs.msupress.org/index.php/RPA/article/view/7379 Brandon Johnson Copyright (c) 2023 Brandon Johnson https://ojs.msupress.org/index.php/RPA/article/view/7379 Thu, 13 Jul 2023 00:00:00 -0400 Book Review of Remembering Women Differently: Refiguring Rhetorical Work https://ojs.msupress.org/index.php/RPA/article/view/7495 <div><span lang="EN">Book review of </span><em><span lang="EN">Remembering Women Differently: Refiguring Rhetorical Work</span></em></div> <div>&nbsp;</div> Carly S. Woods Copyright (c) 2023 Carly S. Woods https://ojs.msupress.org/index.php/RPA/article/view/7495 Thu, 13 Jul 2023 00:00:00 -0400 Embodied Alliances Across Difference https://ojs.msupress.org/index.php/RPA/article/view/7046 <p>This essay explores how space, place, and body factor into coalition-building across</p> <p>difference. In particular, the author focuses on performative and corporeal aspects of U.S.</p> <p>military Veterans at Standing Rock in 2016 and 2017. The aim is to identify how</p> <p>embodied presence enables social alliances and transformative coalitional subjectivities</p> <p>to form</p> Lisa Silvestri Copyright (c) 2023 Lisa Silvestri https://ojs.msupress.org/index.php/RPA/article/view/7046 Thu, 13 Jul 2023 00:00:00 -0400 Obama in Osawatomie: the Limits of Rhetoric about Public Policy and the Power of a Coherent Ideological Vision https://ojs.msupress.org/index.php/RPA/article/view/6844 <p>President Barack Obama faced very difficult electoral prospects in the summer of 2011.&nbsp; A slow economic recovery, along with Republican efforts to block his agenda, had undercut his message of hope and change.&nbsp; Obama’s speech in Osawatomie, Kansas has been widely recognized as a crucial moment in his successful 2012 campaign.&nbsp; Obama’s speech was important not because he supported new policies, but because it corrected a major flaw in the community-oriented narrative at the core of his message.&nbsp; Obama reenergized his retelling of the American Dream by shifting the villain in his narrative from partisanship to the greedy rich.</p> Robert C. Rowland Copyright (c) 2023 Robert C. Rowland https://ojs.msupress.org/index.php/RPA/article/view/6844 Thu, 13 Jul 2023 00:00:00 -0400 Replacing Notorious: Barret, Ginsburg, and postfeminist positioning https://ojs.msupress.org/index.php/RPA/article/view/7175 <p>This essay offers a reading of Amy Coney Barrett’s confirmation hearings to make sense of how widespread outrage of replacing the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg with a conservative idealogue was resolved through the invocation of postfeminist motherhood. I argue that a combining a sensibility of postfeminism that historicizes and individualizes gender-based oppression with an idealization of motherhood positions Barrett as the logical and defensible successor to both Ginsburg’s seat, and her legacy of feminist work. I conclude with the implications of this circulation of postfeminist motherhood, with specific focus on political movements for equality and treatment of women.&nbsp;</p> Calvin R Coker Copyright (c) 2023 Calvin R Coker https://ojs.msupress.org/index.php/RPA/article/view/7175 Thu, 13 Jul 2023 00:00:00 -0400 Designing “The People”: Constitutive Fractures in Contemporary Collectives https://ojs.msupress.org/index.php/RPA/article/view/7042 <p>At the 2017 Women’s March, Shepard Fairey’s We The People posters generated a great deal of excitement for their patriotic depiction of a diverse “people.” But the posters’ success exists in tension with the broader critiques of the Women’s March. This essay argues that our current understanding of constitutive rhetoric is ill equipped to explain this tension. Using the ideas of Danielle Allen and feminist scholars Aimee Carrillo Rowe, Karma Chávez, and Alyssa A. Samek, I perform several readings of the posters to explicate the fractures within our theories of constitutive rhetoric. I demonstrate that our current understanding of “the people” through <em>oneness</em> is hampered by a unity/difference binary that limits our ability to understand heterogenous collectives. Instead, I argue that an approach of <em>wholeness</em> better captures the complex collective life of contemporary coalitions and better attunes scholars to the intricate ways “the people” come into being. I argue that shifting the key terms of constitutive rhetoric to <em>solidarity</em>, <em>vision</em>, and <em>health</em> can help critics develop a more nuanced understanding of diverse coalitions. Overall, this essay offers scholars an opportunity to rethink our theories of “the people” to better account for the emerging strategies, needs, and values of contemporary collectives.</p> Daniel DeVinney Copyright (c) 2023 Daniel DeVinney https://ojs.msupress.org/index.php/RPA/article/view/7042 Thu, 13 Jul 2023 00:00:00 -0400