Rhetoric & Public Affairs
https://ojs.msupress.org/index.php/RPA
<span><em>Rhetoric & Public Affairs</em> is an interdisciplinary journal devoted to the history, theory, and criticism of public discourse. Arenas of rhetorical investigation might include but are by no means limited to campaigns for social, political, environmental or economic justice; modes of resistance to those campaigns; situated instances of executive leadership; legislative and judicial deliberations; comparative rhetorics; transnational diplomacy; digital circulation and mediation of public discourse; and/or constitution of political and social identities. Critical, analytical, or interpretive essays examining symbolic influences in any historical period (including the contemporary) anywhere in the world are welcome. Of special interest are manuscripts that interrogate dynamics of power and privilege, voice and voicelessness, oppression and resistance as well as axes of identity such as race, gender, sexuality, ability, citizenship, and class, as these take form in concrete rhetorical situations. Moreover, we welcome essays that explore the nexus of rhetoric, politics, and ethics–the worlds of power, persuasion, and social values as they meet in the crucible of public deliberation, debate, and protest.</span>en-USRhetoric & Public Affairs<p><span>Articles accepted for publication cannot go to print without a signed agreement:</span></p><p><a href="https://dhjhkxawhe8q4.cloudfront.net/michigan-state-university-press/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/09183045/RPA-Author-Publishing-Agreement.pdf">Article Publishing Agreement</a></p><p><a href="https://dhjhkxawhe8q4.cloudfront.net/michigan-state-university-press/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/09183854/RPA-Book-Review-Publishing-Agreement.pdf">Book Review Publishing Agreement</a></p>Queering Pasts and Futures of Public Address
https://ojs.msupress.org/index.php/RPA/article/view/9195
<p>When <em>Queering Public Address: Sexualities in American Historical Discourse</em> was published in 2007 by University of South Carolina Press, it constituted the first collective effort to bring queer studies directly into public address and more broadly into rhetorical studies. The project stood on the shoulders of earlier interventions in the discipline of Communication, especially <em>Gay Speak: Gay Male and Lesbian Communication</em> (1981) and <em>Queer Words, Queer Images: Communication and the Construction of Homosexuality </em>(1994).</p> <p> </p> <p><a href="#_ftnref1" name="_ftn1"></a></p> <p> </p>Charles MorrisPamela VanHaitsma
Copyright (c) 2026 Charles Morris, Pamela VanHaitsma
2026-08-062026-08-06283-4Transing Public Address
https://ojs.msupress.org/index.php/RPA/article/view/9164
<p>Trans people have been absent from much of public address history. Historical figures like French noble, diplomat, and spy Chevalière d'Eon and British doctor James Barry have been subject to skepticism about their trans identities instead of being analyzed as exemplars of trans public address. In rhetorical scholarship, the analysis of trans rhetoric has been limited to a few contemporary examples, with more attention given to efforts to restrict trans rights and discourse surrounding our deaths. Given the limited presence of trans people in rhetoric and public address, I argue for the need to trans public address. Transing public address is built on Yep, Russo, and Allen’s concept of transing, in which gender is seen as contingent and frequently being assembled and reassembled, and asks rhetorical scholars to ask “what if” in response to questions around trans inclusion in public address instead of rejecting this inclusion to uphold essentialist understandings of gender.</p>Lucy Miller
Copyright (c) 2026 Lucy Miller
2026-08-062026-08-06283-4Gather the Children: Trans of Color Liberation Rhetoric as Provision
https://ojs.msupress.org/index.php/RPA/article/view/9150
<p> “Gathering” is a Black queer vernacular term that refers to discursive and embodied performances of community, resistance, insult and offense, and self-defense. Through engagement with the trans of color liberation rhetorics of Indya Moore and Qween Jean, “gatherings” are revealed as embodied and relational rhetorical acts that collect, bring together, or otherwise provide for queers of color across difference. We argue that gatherings serve as a rhetoric of <em>provision</em>, which indexes a rhetor’s discursive maneuvers to provide marginalized communities—in this instance, queer and trans communities—with care and resources to counter systemic and institutional violence at multiple intersections.</p>Ashley Noel MackRico Self
Copyright (c) 2026 Ashley Noel Mack, Rico Self
2026-08-062026-08-06283-4Unknowing Nex Benedict
https://ojs.msupress.org/index.php/RPA/article/view/9169
<p>Nex Benedict, a nonbinary 16-year-old with Choctaw heritage, died by suicide in Oklahoma in 2024 after enduring anti-trans bullying and being beaten up at school. Nex has been amplified as a figure for collective mourning, an exemplar of the cruel ongoing attacks on queer and trans youth and the devastations of settler colonialism. But efforts to capture Nex’s memory raise questions about how 2SLGBTQ+ communities and scholars extract value from the deaths of queer and trans people of color, even as we seek to illuminate their entanglements with broader cultural patterns of racialized transantagonism. This essay therefore asks if we, as scholars of queer public address, can orient ourselves more ethically toward Nex and others like him. I propose “critical queer disorientation” as a mode of engagement that emphasizes the suspended state of disorientation based in the lived embodiments of Black, Brown, Indigenous, queer, trans, and Two-Spirit people. A critical queer disorientation can be a practice of rhetorical inquiry, a resource for political invention and community solidarity, and a means for reimagining the future of queer public address scholarship.</p>Erin J. Rand
Copyright (c) 2026 Erin J. Rand
2026-08-062026-08-06283-4Pauli Murray's Intersectional Quest for Equality
https://ojs.msupress.org/index.php/RPA/article/view/9154
<p>Pauli Murray's advocacy efforts provides insight into the inventional possibilities of intersectional and analogical arguments.</p>Isaac West
Copyright (c) 2026 Isaac West
2026-08-062026-08-06283-4Queer Worldmaking in Frictional Space: The Promise of Queering Public Address
https://ojs.msupress.org/index.php/RPA/article/view/9183
<p>This essay examines the debate about lesbian rights that took place at the National Women’s Conference in honor of International Women’s Year (IWY), held in Houston, Texas in November 1977. This unique moment brought together white, conservative, antifeminist, anti-queer women, into the same space with BIPOC and white straight feminists, and BIPOC and white lesbian feminists. I examine how their collective presence and conflicting rhetoric concerning lesbian rights or “sexual preference” at IWY created a generative frictional space. I illustrate how queering public address and engaging with archives as an “archival queer” recuperates queer voices and experiences, enhances their visibility in the pages of our journals, adds complexity to rhetorical histories, and resists structures of power in the discipline.</p>Alyssa Samek
Copyright (c) 2026 Alyssa Samek
2026-08-062026-08-06283-4Untranslatability as Queer Failure: Reimagining Engagement in the Politics of Meaning
https://ojs.msupress.org/index.php/RPA/article/view/9153
<p>This essay argues that public discourse is structured by heteronormativity and geopolitical power, rendering queer—especially transnational queer—experiences marginal or unintelligible within dominant rhetorical frameworks. Drawing on queer and transnational scholarship, it foregrounds translationality as a vital condition of queer articulation. Examining translational failure—untranslatability, multiplicity, and friction—as a queer methodology, the essay demonstrates how transnational queer experiences disrupt linguistic hierarchies and reconfigure the parameters of public address.</p>Shuzhen Huang
Copyright (c) 2026 Shuzhen Huang
2026-08-062026-08-06283-4The Rhetoric of Queer Catachresis
https://ojs.msupress.org/index.php/RPA/article/view/9167
<p style="font-weight: 400;">This article engages how queers are made to combat contrived catachreses that inhibit responses to cultural maltreatment from authoritarian regimes. I argue that LGBTQ+ scholars have long confronted these catachrestic figurations but have also successfully repurposed such aspersions in generative fashion. A reclamation of catachresis by queer critics can function as a rejoinder to the stifling delirium manufactured by anti-queer factions. I conclude by turning to queer rhetorical scholars whose work offers us a path forward in chaotic times.</p>Jeffrey Bennett
Copyright (c) 2026 Jeffrey Bennett
2026-08-062026-08-06283-4Notes from Northeastern
https://ojs.msupress.org/index.php/RPA/article/view/9201
<p>This essay attends to recent policy changes at universities nationwide and their impact. </p>Morgan DiCesare
Copyright (c) 2026 Morgan DiCesare
2026-08-062026-08-06283-4Clandestine Public Address
https://ojs.msupress.org/index.php/RPA/article/view/9158
<p style="font-weight: 400;">This article examines how the second Trump administration uses executive orders, lawsuits, and public address to attack the norms of government while attempting to contract who counts as the people (<em>dēmos</em>). We argue that queering public address stands as a necessary direct action against this lethal antidemocratic agenda. Further, we posit that clandestine communication–a queer form of public address that moves via stealth and fugitive transmissions–is a vital resource for providing care and mutual aid and for resisting a government keen to displace and erase its ever-expanding list of enemies.</p>Annie HillLisa A. Flores
Copyright (c) 2026 Annie Hill, Lisa A. Flores
2026-08-062026-08-06283-4Recommitting to Transformation in Queering Public Address
https://ojs.msupress.org/index.php/RPA/article/view/9204
<p>This essay argues for a recommittment to a core tenant of the queering historical discourse project: transformation. While transformation of the field was a key component of the edited volume, <em>Queering Public Address</em>, today, the author argues queer scholars in communication and rhetoric must be willing to push the boundaries further. Key strategies advanced include investing in the local, making a pivot to production, and going "back to the steets." </p>Thomas R. Dunn
Copyright (c) 2026 Thomas R. Dunn
2026-08-062026-08-06283-4Quotidian Queerness: Navigating the Betwixt and Between of Queer Public Address
https://ojs.msupress.org/index.php/RPA/article/view/9155
<p style="font-weight: 400;">According to a recent Gallup survey, America is “queerer” than ever. Despite this, the flurry of executive orders from the Trump administration showcases the material violence, erasure, and threat of oblivion for LGBTQ+ populations from the public sphere. This potential tension between queerness’ normalization as an increasingly everyday experience and its simultaneous political marginalization poses a vital methodological question for <em>all </em>scholars of rhetoric and public address: how do we study the public that is not public and how do we address those who cannot be acknowledged? Responding to these ongoing complexities, we argue that an increasingly important resource for scholars of queer public address is a (re)turn to archives. Specifically, we urge renewed scholarly interest in the everyday affective quietness contained within vernacular and quotidian objects in traditional and non-traditional archives alike.</p>Jeffrey NagelKelly Williams Nagel
Copyright (c) 2026 Jeffrey Nagel, Kelly Williams Nagel
2026-08-062026-08-06283-4What’s a Homonormative to Do? Notes from the Institutionally Compromised
https://ojs.msupress.org/index.php/RPA/article/view/9205
<p>Queering a disciplinary formation like the field of public address is a queerly normative thing to do. Pulling strands from queer rhetorics, abolitionist theory and practice, and Latin American political theory, this essay muddles about in the implications, difficulties, and promise of that project, ultimatley approaching both 'queer' and 'public address' sidelong and askance.</p>Christa J. Olson
Copyright (c) 2026 Christa J. Olson
2026-08-062026-08-06283-4The The Pink Scar: How Nazi Persecution Shaped the Struggle for LGBTQ+ Rights by Thomas R. Dunn. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 2025; pp. xiv + 206, $99.95 hardcover; $24.99 paperback; $9.99 ebook.
https://ojs.msupress.org/index.php/RPA/article/view/9134
Linda Horwitz
Copyright (c) 2026 Linda Horwitz
2026-08-062026-08-06283-4Minor Troubles: Racial Figurations of Youth Sexuality and Childhood's Queerness, by Erin J. Rand
https://ojs.msupress.org/index.php/RPA/article/view/9108
Dylan Rollo
Copyright (c) 2026 Dylan Rollo
2026-08-062026-08-06283-4Not Playing Around: Feminist and Queer Rhetorics in Videogames (review)
https://ojs.msupress.org/index.php/RPA/article/view/9137
Maria Tsangarakis
Copyright (c) 2026 Maria Tsangarakis
2026-08-062026-08-06283-4Queer Silence: On Disability and Rhetorical Absence. By J. Logan Smilges. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2022. pp. vi + 288.
https://ojs.msupress.org/index.php/RPA/article/view/9130
Jackson Tucker
Copyright (c) 2026 Jackson Tucker
2026-08-062026-08-06283-4Truth Be Told: White Nostalgia and Antiracist Queer Resistance In "Post-Truth" America by Laura E. Tetreault (review)
https://ojs.msupress.org/index.php/RPA/article/view/9138
Kenneth Avery
Copyright (c) 2026 Kenneth Avery
2026-08-062026-08-06283-4